- Intel Celeron Processor 1007u 2m Cache 1.50 Ghz Processor
- Intel Celeron Processor 1007u 2m Cache 1.50 Ghz Wi-fi
Intel® Celeron® Processor 1007U (2M Cache, 1.50 GHz) quick reference guide including specifications, features, pricing, compatibility, design documentation, ordering codes, spec codes and more. インテル® Celeron® プロセッサー 1007U (2M キャッシュ、1.50 GHz) 仕様、機能、価格、対応する製品、設計資料、製品コード、スペックコードなどが分かるクイック・リファレンス・ガイド。.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N3060 vs 1007U among all CPUs
Benchmark performance using all cores |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Individual core benchmark performance |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Are you paying a premium for performance? |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Winner
IntelN3060 CPUBoss recommends the IntelN3060 based on its performance and power consumption. See full details |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
Reasons to consider the
IntelN3060 | Report a correction |
|
| Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 20.1 | vs | 17.4 | More than 15% better 3DMark06 CPU score |
|---|
| Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later |
|---|
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor |
|---|
| Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | 4.58 mPixels/s | vs | 3.8 mPixels/s | More than 20% better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score |
|---|
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core |
|---|
| Much better performance per watt | 11.43 pt/W | vs | 4.38 pt/W | More than 2.5x better performance per watt |
|---|
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.48 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | Around 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air) |
|---|
| Lower typical power consumption | 4.88W | vs | 13.81W | 2.8x lower typical power consumption |
|---|
| Newer | Jan, 2016 | vs | Jan, 2013 | Release date over 2 years later |
|---|
| Lower annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | vs | 4.1 $/year | 2.8x lower annual home energy cost |
|---|
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | vs | 14.89 $/year | 2.8x lower annual commercial energy cost |
|---|
Reasons to consider the
IntelCeleron 1007U | Report a correction |
|
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 818 | vs | 536 | Around 55% better PassMark (Single core) score |
|---|
Benchmarks Real world tests of N3060 vs Celeron 1007U
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining)Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation)Data courtesy CompuBench
CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition)Data courtesy CompuBench
Intel Celeron Processor 1007u 2m Cache 1.50 Ghz Processor
summary | N3060 | vs | Celeron 1007U |
|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
|---|
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core |
|---|
features |
|---|
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes |
|---|
| Supports trusted computing | No | No |
|---|
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes |
|---|
| Instruction set extensions |
|---|
| SSE2 |
| MMX |
| SSE4 |
| SSE3 |
| SSE |
| SSE4.1 |
| SSE4.2 |
| Supplemental SSE3 |
| AES |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
|---|
power consumption |
|---|
| TDP | 6W | 17W |
|---|
| Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 4.1 $/year |
|---|
| Annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | 14.89 $/year |
|---|
| Performance per watt | 11.43 pt/W | 4.38 pt/W |
|---|
| Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 13.81W |
|---|
bus |
|---|
| Architecture | FSB | DMI |
|---|
| Number of links | 1 | 1 |
|---|
Intel Celeron Processor 1007u 2m Cache 1.50 Ghz Wi-fi
details | N3060 | vs | Celeron 1007U |
|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 |
|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
|---|
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 0.5 MB |
|---|
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core |
|---|
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm |
|---|
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 |
|---|
overclocking |
|---|
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.48 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
|---|
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
|---|
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.48 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
|---|
integrated graphics |
|---|
| GPU | GPU | GPU |
|---|
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 400 | Intel® HD Graphics |
|---|
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
|---|
| GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | 350 MHz |
|---|
memory controller |
|---|
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in |
|---|
| Memory type |
|---|
| DDR3L-1600 |
| DDR3 |
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
|---|
| Supports ECC | No | No |
|---|
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s |
|---|
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 32,768 MB |
|---|